Richmond —

Virginia’s farm winery fights are almost never about wine. They are about weddings, parking, amplified music and how many cars turn onto a two-lane road on a Saturday. And they turn, over and over, on one phrase in state law.

The six things a locality cannot touch

Section 15.2-2288.3 puts a list of activities beyond local regulation entirely. A county cannot regulate:

• Production and harvesting of fruit and other agricultural products, and the manufacture of wine
• On-premises sale, tasting and consumption of wine during regular business hours
• Direct shipment to consumers by common carrier
• Sale of wine to wholesalers and out-of-state purchasers
• Storage, warehousing and wholesaling of wine
• Sale of wine-related items incidental to the sale of wine

If a proposed local ordinance touches any of those, it is on very weak ground. This is the part of the statute farm winery owners most often do not know exists.

The phrase everything actually turns on

Beyond that list, the statute says usual and customary activities and events at farm wineries shall be permitted without local regulation unless there is a substantial impact on the health, safety, or welfare of the public.

That single sentence is where the arguments live.

Note the structure. The default is permitted. The burden sits with the locality, and the standard is not “neighbors object” or “traffic increased.” It is substantial impact on health, safety or welfare. A county wanting to cap your event size has to clear that bar, not simply prefer a quieter road.

The Commonwealth also declares a policy of preserving the wine industry’s economic viability, and requires that local restrictions be reasonable and take into account the economic impact on the winery, the agricultural nature of the activity, and industry custom. “Industry custom” is doing real work there: what other Virginia farm wineries normally do is evidence for what yours may do.

Noise

Specifically addressed, and specifically limited. A locality cannot impose a noise restriction on a farm winery more restrictive than its general noise ordinance.

The one carve-out is outdoor amplified music, where the locality may consider effects on adjacent property owners and nearby residents. So amplified outdoor music is the negotiable piece. A blanket winery-only noise rule stricter than what applies to everyone else is not.

Private gatherings

A quieter provision worth knowing: a farm winery owner cannot be regulated differently than any other citizen for hosting a private personal gathering where no wine is sold. If your county tries to treat your family’s own party as a winery event, that is the section to point at.

Where this is moving

The pressure is at the county level, not in Richmond. Fairfax County has been working through agritourism zoning changes, and Albemarle County, which has as much farm winery activity as anywhere in the state, maintains its own guidance for agricultural operations and farm wineries, breweries and distilleries.

There is also a separate building-code track. Section 36-98.4 covers agritourism event buildings, which matters enormously if you are converting a barn into an event space. The zoning question and the building code question are different questions with different answers, and operators routinely solve one and get stopped by the other.

If you are in a dispute now

Get the ordinance text and compare it to the protected list. If it reaches a listed activity, that is your first argument and it is a strong one.

Make them meet the standard. Substantial impact on health, safety or welfare is a real burden. Ask what evidence supports it.

Check the noise ordinance against the general one. A winery-specific stricter limit is vulnerable.

Document industry custom. What comparable Virginia farm wineries do is relevant, and the statute says so.

Separate zoning from building code. Solving one does not solve the other.

---

Farm winery disputes are fact-specific and locally political in ways a statute summary cannot capture. If your county is moving on an ordinance, read § 15.2-2288.3 yourself. It is short, and it is the document everyone in the room will be arguing about.